MicroMimesis › Forums › Products Blog › Industrial › Electrical › Insulators › O scale Telephone/Telegraph Pole Insulator Evolution
- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 7 years, 8 months ago by
MicroTraxx.
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 18, 2016 at 2:44 am #482
MicroTraxx
KeymasterReal World InsulatorVersion 1This was my first attempt. The sprues are huge .. but you are limited in that Shapeways has a minimum wire dia for FUD (a wire being a shape that has a length that is 1-1/2 times it’s diameter). This means that .6mm is the minimum dia. I put the insulators on a central sprue. In hindsight while this worked it meant that you could only paint to rows at a time. Still .. they worked.
They came out pretty good overall. I didn’t like the big honking sprue as I said. Cutting off most of the sprue and inserting into a cross-arm worked and you mostly can’t see the oversize pin but what I wanted was an insulator that could fit over a wire. The problem being these little O scale insulators need to be sprued in some fashion.
Version 2-ishI call this Version 2-ish because there were several versions .. I supposed should have been called Version 2a, Version 2b and so on. I was attempting to create a way for the insulator body to snap off of the sprue – leaving a hole for a wire pin. To do this I tried four smaller sprues at the top of the longer sprue. The picture is actually from my 1:24 version but the principal is the same.
In any case .. it didn’t work. It printed but those little tabs and narrow spacing etc. all fused together. Oh well. You gotta try.Version 3Next I wondered if I could rotate the insulator 180° and attach the top to the sprue leaving the bottom with the opening clear. There would be a scar where the insulator detached from the sprue but at this scale it might just be fine. Wanting to keep any such scaring to a minimum I made the little connecting sprue 0.4mm dia. I returned to a central main sprue since the insulators would be detached before painting.
So. What next? I considered increasing the size of the connecting-sprue from the current (and breaking) 0.4mm to 0.6mm .. but the problem is that now this sprue is starting to approach the dia at the top of the insulator. This seems to me to be a blind alley – heck I don’t know that increasing the sprue that much will even help. So .. to Version 4 ..
Version 4I went back to attaching to the base of the insulator. What if I made a fairly large connecting-sprue as shown. The 0.38mm/0.15″ hole passes completely through. This size hole would let the insulator sit on a 0.015″ wire pin. I like this because the pin would be near to the full-scale 1/2″ dimension. I am pretty sure I can get a 0.38mm/0.015″ hole printed – not so much a 0.25mm/0.010″ hole. The 1mm O.D. is enough to give us 0.31mm walls – which is a slight padding to the 0.3mm minimum wall thickness for FUD/FXD. The idea is that you take a X-Acto knife and slice the insulator off of the sprue at the base of the insulator. I suspect the knife needs to be sharp as a dull knife might collapse the pin hole.
-
AuthorPosts
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.